What this player audit can tell you
The summary answers narrow questions from the available game headers: how the recent results split by color, which time controls appeared, which opening names repeated and whether several losses share one of those labels. It does not run an engine, assess move quality or claim that a five-game pattern is a permanent weakness.
Turn a pattern into useful work
If one result looks worth investigating, use the free game review for move-by-move Stockfish analysis. To inspect a broader opponent's opening history instead of a five-game snapshot, use the opponent scout. Coaches and students can then keep the position, variations and lesson notes together in Chessdesk Studies.
Questions about the quick audit
What does the chess player analysis check?
It reads up to the five most recent public games returned for a Chess.com or Lichess username. It summarizes wins, draws and losses, results by color, time controls, opening labels and repeated patterns among losses.
Does this quick audit use a chess engine?
No. The quick audit does not run an engine or judge individual moves. It uses public game results and PGN headers. Open a game in the Chessdesk Game Review when you want Stockfish analysis, accuracy and move classifications.
Can five games identify my chess weaknesses?
Not reliably. Five recent games can reveal a pattern worth checking, but they cannot prove a stable weakness or describe your overall playing strength. Treat the result as a starting point for review.
Are my games stored?
No. The tool requests recent public games from Chess.com or Lichess and summarizes them for the current visit. It does not save the games to a Chessdesk account.